Engravings of the year 1622

468-The actual drawing of the town and fortress of Hanau.

The actual drawing of the town and fortress of Hanau.

Hanau, dne 01.01.1622 (do 31.12.1622)

The schematic illustration of the town of Hanau, which lies close to the river Main, about 20 kilometers west from Frankfurt. A small river Künzig flows around the town. In the landscape, few individual trees are drawn. In the left top corner, there is a rectangle with an inscription above, without a given time and specification. Also, the image does not show, except for three cannons located in the town square, any military motives.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: neznámý

Originální název: Eigentliche Delineation der Statt und Vestung Hanau.

The town and fortress of Hanau is located very close to the battlefield of Hochst, where a great battle between Tilly and Christian of Brunswick – Halberstadt took place on 20 June 1622. In the context of this battle, there were without any doubt combat actions near Hanau which thematically inspired the author of this graphic to picture the town.

70-True depiction of famous Gulch (Jülich) fortress, besieged by Count Henry of Berg from 5 September 1621 in the name of His Imperial Majesty, abandoned on 12 December and conquered upon agreement on 3 February 1622.

True depiction of famous Gulch (Jülich) fortress, besieged by Count Henry of Berg from 5 September 1621 in the name of His Imperial Majesty, abandoned on 12 December and conquered upon agreement on 3 February 1622.

Jülich, dne 03.02.1622

The engraving is quite crude. In the centre, there is the Jülich fortress with troops marching around and enemy units leaving the town. Wide neighbourhood of the city is dotted with various chances, fortifications and military camps. A hill will gallows on top is in the foreground. A portrait of Henry, Count of Berg is in the left upper corner, on the right, there is a coat of arms with a lion. German description of the situation with marking of camps of Berg and Spinola is below the painting on the board. Under it, there is a detailed description of the event in Latin, which celebrated the heroism and credit of general of Berg.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: neznámý

Originální název: Wahre Abcontrafaitung der berümbten Vestung Gulch vom Herrn Graven Heinrich von Berg im Namen Röm. Kai. mt. den 5. September Annno 1621 geschen von newem abgeressen den 12. Decb. Anno 1622 den 3. Februar mitt Accord genommen.

Truce between the Netherlands and Spain only existed from 1609 to 1621. Then there were military conflicts between both countries again; the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire took the side of Spain. The Spaniards were lead by Marquise Spinola, Henry, Count of Berg was the commander of imperial forces. The siege of the Jülich fortress, which lies approximately 30 km to the west from Cologne, and which was conquered by general Berg on 3 February 1622, was one of the first joined battle actions against the Netherlands. The emperor's interest in the campaign was caused by the fact that House of Habsburg owned certain, very extensive, lands in the Netherlands (currently Belgium). The alliance with Spain was conditioned by common Catholic religion and the affinity of ruling houses. The House of Habsburg ownership of lands in the Netherlands lasted up to Napoleon I.

72-Drawing of Jülich fortress, which was conquered by Spaniards. 162.. (1622).

Drawing of Jülich fortress, which was conquered by Spaniards. 162.. (1622).

Jülich, dne 03.02.1622

The painting shows the Jülich fortress and city near the Dutch borders with its surroundings. The upper part of the painting shows the Roer (Ruhr) river, a wide circle of fortifications, chances and various fortification objects, military camps, movements of military units etc. A hill with gallows is in the foreground. Some settlements in the area are marked with names.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Keller G., mědirytec

Originální název: Abrisz der Festung Gülch wie dieselbe von den Spanischen eingenommen worden ist. 162.. (1622).

Truce between the Netherlands and Spain only existed from 1609 to 1621. Then there were military conflicts between both countries again; the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire took the side of Spain. The Spaniards were lead by Marquise Spinola, Henry, Count of Berg was the commander of imperial forces. The siege of the Jülich fortress, which lies approximately 30 km to the west from Cologne, and which was conquered by general Berg on 3 February 1622, was one of the first joined battle actions against the Netherlands. The emperor's interest in the campaign was caused by the fact that House of Habsburg owned certain, very extensive, lands in the Netherlands (currently Belgium). The alliance with Spain was conditioned by common Catholic religion and the affinity of ruling houses. The House of Habsburg ownership of lands in the Netherlands lasted up to Napoleon I.

74-True drawing of Pratigov in Meyefeldst estate, which lies around Chur, and surrounding lands; battle of Pündtners against their enemies. In 1622.

True drawing of Pratigov in Meyefeldst estate, which lies around Chur, and surrounding lands; battle of Pündtners against their enemies. In 1622.

Pratigov, dne 24.04.1622 (do 22.05.1622)

We can see a hilly Swiss country with the Rhein river and Chur city, near which is a battle of armies, which come from all directions. Cities and villages are named. Territorial borders are marked with dotted line. Below the painting, there is the aforementioned text.

Signace: H. C. Gyger desig.
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Wahrhaffte Verzeichnus desz Prattigöws der Herrschaft Meyenfeldt Gelegenheit umb Chur und angrenzender Landschaften sampt dem Treffen so die Pündtner mit ihren Feinnden gethan. Im Jahr 1622.

Already during the Reformation in 16th century, persistent conflicts and fights between Catholics and Calvinists were occurring in the Swiss canton Graubünden; these culminated in notorious slaughter of Calvinists and Protestants in Valtellina. In 1620, Swiss and Spanish army invaded Graubünden and garrisoned the entire land. However, constant fights with local population were occurring during this period – until the Calvinists managed to conquer the Chur fortress on 22 May 1622. The imperial-Spanish army, lead by colonel Balderon, withdrew. The reasons of the imperial campaign into Graubünden were not only religious, but in the first place, there was a strategic interest to seize important Alpine mountain passes. For the imperial ally – Spain, these passes were of vital importance, because they were a part of the so-called Spanish road, which enabled the Spanish crown to supply the armies in the Netherlands and in the Holy Roman Empire with supplies and soldiers. Because of Dutch ships and pirates, the sea route was off-limits for Spain.

75-Plan view of Hagenau

Plan view of Hagenau

Hagenau, dne 03.05.1622

It is a schematically drawn city plan without figures and any staffage. In the right corner, there is a city coat of arms with a rose, on the left, there is a fortress founded by Mansfeld, which was subsequently closed down. Under the painting, there is a legend.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Grundriss der Statt Hagenau.

After the defeat of the Bohemian revolt in 1620, the war moved to lands to the west from Cheb – into Upper Palatinate, where, however, the situation of marshal of Frederick V, Elector Palatine, Ernst von Mansfeld, became very difficult, mostly because of epidemic outbreak and because of strong pressure of Tilly's army from the south. That was why Mansfeld decided to withdraw to Rhenish Palatinate. He performed this tactic movement so skilfully that his enemies were completely surprised. The Spanish army, lead by Spinola and Cordoba, laid in Rhenish Palatinate; however, Mansfeld had avoided any encounter, taken Hagenau and forced the city to pay 100 000 gold pieces. Then he moved to Saarland because of supply reasons and he left a garrison in Hagenau. In the meantime, a situation, which lead to Tilly's victory over Protestant armies near Wimpfen on 8 May 1622, was created. After an unsuccessful attempt to take the city of Zabern in Alsace, Mansfeld returned to Hagenau, where in the meantime emperor's brother, archduke Leopold, was trying to reoccupy the city that was taken by Mansfeld. Five days before Tilly's victory at Wimpfen, Mansfeld had liberated Hagenau from encirclement of Leopold's armies at the eleventh hour; Leopold's armies retreated hastily.

77-Sketch of the battle, which happened between Margrave of Baden-Durlach and Tilly, the Imperial and Bavarian General.

Sketch of the battle, which happened between Margrave of Baden-Durlach and Tilly, the Imperial and Bavarian General.

Wimpfen, dne 08.05.1622

The engraving is done (superficially and apparently hastily) in the manner of maps; streams are drawn as in reality. Cities and villages are marked with their names. Heilbronn at the bottom left and Wimpfen at top right. The explanatory notes A to L contain explications of the depicted events. In the middle of the engraving, there is a distinguishable wagon fortification with the mark 'D'. There is the inscription above: 'Palatinatus', and: 'Pars Ducatus Würtenbergensis' is below.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Abrisz der Schlacht, so zwischen Herrn Markgrafen von Durlach und Monsieur Tilly, als Kays. und Bayerischen Generalen vorgangen.

The first phase of the Thirty Years' War ended in the defeat of the Bohemian revolt. The centre of the combat moved from the Bohemia to the Rhine Palatinate, hereditary territory of Frederick V, Elector Palatine. He was regarded as the main representative of the Protestant opposition in the Empire by the Emperor. Frederick V, Elector Palatine's power position was shaken by the defeat of the revolting troops in the Battle of the White Mountain in 1620. But he was not alone in his fight. Many of his followers were involved in the campaign: Georg Friedrich, Margrave of Baden-Durlach, Christian the Younger of Brunswick, Ernest von Mansfeld and many more. They also received support from abroad, notably from the King James I of England, who was the father-in-law of Frederick V, Elector Palatine. The main commander of the Imperial-Bavarian army, who was appointed to lead the combat in the Palatinate, was the General Johann Tserclaes, Count of Tilly. One of the important events of the Palatinate campaign was the Battle of Wimpfen on 6 May 1622. Georg Friedrich, Margrave of Baden-Durlach encountered Tilly with the Spanish General Córdoba. Luck was on the side of the Catholic forces. Due to successful strategic actions, Tilly and Córdoba had a strong superiority. George Friedrich relied only on his 'wagenburg' – outdated tactics of armed wagons. The battle lasted from early morning until noon, when Tilly withdrew his troops to have a rest into the nearby Dornet forest. Margrave of Baden-Durlach had armed wagons in the middle of his formations and in the background, there is another group of armed wagons with supplies of ammunition. In the afternoon, Tilly launched a new attack on the 'wagenburg', which was unsuccessful at first but later he managed to destroy the ammunition supply by precise artillery which caused confusion in the Protestant army. Tilly’s troops then intruded into the enemy’s position and, at the same time, joined the attack of the Córdoba’s cavalry that consistently finished their task. The Protestant troops fled back over the Böllinger stream, which flowed behind them, but the only bridge was insufficient for a quick escape of the disorganized, defeated and completely destroyed army. Margrave of Baden-Durlach lost virtually the whole army here, so he withdrew hurriedly with only small remnants. He then sought refuge outside Germany, because the Emperor had given him the imperial ban.

78-The actual illustration of the famous encounter of Margrave of Baden-Durlach and General Tilly in the Battle of Wimpfen on 7 May 1622.

The actual illustration of the famous encounter of Margrave of Baden-Durlach and General Tilly in the Battle of Wimpfen on 7 May 1622.

Wimpfen, dne 08.05.1622

The engraving shows the progress of the battle in the clouds of blowing dust and smoke from exploding ammunition supply. On the left, there is the river Neckar and the Böllinger stream in the background, which as a natural obstacle caused catastrophic losses to the army of Margrave of Baden-Durlach during their escape. The town of Wimpfen is at bottom right. The battle wagons are clearly visible in the Protestant position. The given inscription is above the image, the explanatory notes A-R are below.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Eigentliche Vorbildung des berübtnen Treffens so zwischen dem Markgrafen von Durlach und General Tilly bey Wimpfen vorgangen. Anno 1622 7. Mai.

Katalogová čísla:
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8470

The first phase of the Thirty Years' War ended in the defeat of the Bohemian revolt. The centre of the combat moved from the Bohemia to the Rhine Palatinate, hereditary territory of Frederick V, Elector Palatine. He was regarded as the main representative of the Protestant opposition in the Empire by the Emperor. Frederick V, Elector Palatine's power position was shaken by the defeat of the revolting troops in the Battle of the White Mountain in 1620. But he was not alone in his fight. Many of his followers were involved in the campaign: Georg Friedrich, Margrave of Baden-Durlach, Christian the Younger of Brunswick, Ernest von Mansfeld and many more. They also received support from abroad, notably from the King James I of England, who was the father-in-law of Frederick V, Elector Palatine. The main commander of the Imperial-Bavarian army, who was appointed to lead the combat in the Palatinate, was the General Johann Tserclaes, Count of Tilly. One of the important events of the Palatinate campaign was the Battle of Wimpfen on 6 May 1622. George Friedrich, Margrave of Baden-Durlach encountered Tilly with the Spanish General Córdoba. Luck was on the side of the Catholic forces. Due to successful strategic actions, Tilly and Córdoba had a strong superiority. George Friedrich relied only on his 'wagenburg' – outdated tactics of armed wagons. The battle lasted from early morning until noon, when Tilly withdrew his troops to have a rest into the nearby Dornet forest. Margrave of Baden-Durlach had armed wagons in the middle of his formations and in the background, there is another group of armed wagons with supplies of ammunition. In the afternoon, Tilly launched a new attack on the 'wagenburg', which was unsuccessful at first, but later, he managed to destroy the ammunition supply by precise artillery which caused confusion in the Protestant army. Tilly’s troops then intruded into the enemy’s position and, at the same time, joined the attack of the Córdoba’s cavalry that consistently finished their task. The Protestant troops fled back over the Böllinger stream, which flowed behind them, but the only bridge was insufficient for a quick escape of the disorganized, defeated and completely destroyed army. Margrave of Baden-Durlach lost virtually the whole army here, so he withdrew hurriedly with only small remnants. He then sought refuge outside Germany, because the Emperor had given him the imperial ban.

79-Actual depiction and short report of a bloody battle and the main clash of imperial forces on one side and Margrave of Durlach, Mansfeld and Palatine armies on the other side, which occurred between Wimpfen and Hailbron on 26 April/6 May 1622.

Actual depiction and short report of a bloody battle and the main clash of imperial forces on one side and Margrave of Durlach, Mansfeld and Palatine armies on the other side, which occurred between Wimpfen and Hailbron on 26 April/6 May 1622.

Wimpfen, dne 08.05.1622

In the right bottom corner of the engraving, there is a double portrait of Tilly and Corduba in an oval cartouche. The print also shows the flow of Neckar, town of Wimpfen and panorama of the battle with an explosion of ammunition of Margrave of Durlach. Above the painting, there is the mentioned text, an A–R legend is below the painting.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Aigentliche Abbildung und kurze Erzelung deren zwischen der kayserlichen und Markgraff. Durlach Mansfeld und Pfalzischen Armaden den 26. April / 6. Mai 1622 zwischen Wimpffen und Haibron gehaltenen Blutigen Schlacht und Haupttreffens.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1575
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8470

The first phase of the Thirty Years' War ended with a defeat of the Czech Estate Revolt. The seat of battles moved from Bohemia to Palatinate, hereditary region of Frederick V, Elector Palatine. The emperor considered him to be the main representative of the Protestant opposition in the empire. The position of power of Frederick V, Elector Palatine was endangered by the defeat of Estate army in the Battle of White Mountain in 1620. However, he was not alone in his fight. Many of his followers joined the fight: George Frederick, Margrave of Baden-Durlach, Christian the Younger, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, Ernst von Mansfeld and others. They were also supported by foreign countries, namely by the English king James I, who was a father-in-law of Frederick V, Elector Palatine. General Johann Tserclaes Tilly was the chief commander of the imperial-Bavarian army and was charged with fighting in the Palatinate. The Battle of Wimpfen on 6 May 1622 was one of the important events of the Palatinate campaign. George Frederick, Margrave of Baden-Durlach met Tilly and Spanish general Cordoba in battle here. Catholic forces were more fortunate. Because of more successful strategic tactics, Tilly and Cordoba had a strong superiority in numbers. George Frederick relied only on his “wagenburg” – obsolete tactics of armed carts. The battle lasted from early morning till noon, when Tilly withdrew his forces to rest to the near Dornet forest. Margrave of Durlach had placed the armed carts in the centre of his ranks and another group of armed carts with ammunition in the rear. In the afternoon, Tilly had commenced a new attack on the “wagenburg”, which was futile initially, but later, precision artillery fire managed to hit the ammunition, which exploded and caused panic in the Protestant army. Tilly's forces then penetrated the position of the enemy easily and at the same time, Cordoba's cavalry attacked and finished the battle. The Protestant forces were fleeing over the Bellingr brook, which flew directly behind their positions, however, single bridge was not sufficient for the retreat of disorganised, defeated army, which was completely crushed. Margrave of Durlach lost almost the entire army, and he withdrew quickly with small remains of his army. Margrave himself sought refuge outside of Germany, because the emperor issued an imperial anathema upon him.

84-Depiction of battle between the army of Elector of Bavaria, Spanish army and Brunswick army near Höchst.

Depiction of battle between the army of Elector of Bavaria, Spanish army and Brunswick army near Höchst.

Höchst, dne 20.06.1622

The engraving shows a well-arranged map of the entire battlefield. The Main river, which flows through Frankfurt and Sachsenhausen, flows through the map diagonally; the town of Höchst with a bridge over Main, on which the defeated Brunswick army crowds, lies near the mouth of the Nidda river on the right shore of Main. Several castles and settlements, which are marked with names, are in the background in hilly terrain.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Contrafactur des Treffens zwischen der Churf: Bayr: Spanisch und Braunschwigen Armaden bey Höchst.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1575
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8470

The second part of the Thirty Years' War was the Palatine war. It followed after the defeat of the Bohemian Revolt on the White Mountain in 1620. Imperial, Bavarian and Spanish armies stood on one side and they were resisted by armies of several German Protestant nobles, who relied mostly upon the financial aid of the English king James I, who supported the interests of his son-in-law, Frederick V, Elector Palatine, with substantial sums of money. These were: Ernst von Mansfeld, field marshal of the “Winter King”, Georg Friedrich, Margrave of Baden-Durlach and Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, who, with his army, stood on the right shore of Main under Frankfurt. Near the town of Höchst, the units of Duke of Brunswick built a bridge over Main, so that they could join the Mansfeld's army, which laid nearby on the other shore. However, when Tilly's army, which wanted to defend Frankfurt, appeared, the Duke of Brunswick and his army fought back. Tilly's forces had superior numbers and they had more artillery. The tactical situation of the Protestant army was bad – for case of retreat, there was nothing but one, quickly built bridge over Main. The battle was not a typical field battle; it was an unclear clash of forces near the town of Höchst and villages named Schäferberg and Sossenheim. Christian Brunswick was being constantly pushed to retreat by the bigger Catholic army and consistent artillery fire. However, the Protestant army lost the most men while retreating. Many men drowned in Main during the confused retreat. A confused crowd of retreating units, which did not manage to cross to the other shore in time, assembled at the bridge in Höchst. The formations of Christian Brunswick resisted heroically, but the result of combat could not be changed any more. Christian Brunswick had achieved his tactical plan to join his and Mansfeld troops, but it cost him 2 000 men. The Catholics probably lost only a little over 100 men.

83-True and certain report with depiction of how Christian, Duke of Brunswick captured Höchst, electoral town of Main, and how his army was defeated and disbanded by all the imperial armies on 20 June of the new calendar, or 10 June of the old calendar, in 1622. Printed in 1622.

True and certain report with depiction of how Christian, Duke of Brunswick captured Höchst, electoral town of Main, and how his army was defeated and disbanded by all the imperial armies on 20 June of the new calendar, or 10 June of the old calendar, in 1622. Printed in 1622.

Höchst, dne 20.06.1622

The painting shows landscape near Höchst and Frankfurt. The Nieda river joins Main near Höchst. On the left, there is the ongoing battle, the defeated army of Christian Brunswick retreats over the bridge over Main. Large column of imperial forces is approaching from Frankfurt. In the left corner of the sheet, there is an A-K legend and on the bottom, there is a German text, describing the course of battle in detail and all relevant facts.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Wahrer und gewisser Bericht sambt Abbildung welcher Gestalt Herzog Christian zu Braunschweig das Churf: Maintzische Stättlin Höchst eingenommen auch wie dessen Armada von den sämbtlichen Kayserlichen Armeen den 20. Juni N.C. oder 10. A.C. dieses lauffenden 1622 Jahrs bey Höchst geschlagen und zerstreut worden. Gedruckt im Jahr 1622

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1584
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8470

The second part of the Thirty Years' War was the Palatine war. It followed after the defeat of the Bohemian Revolt on the White Mountain in 1620. Imperial, Bavarian and Spanish armies stood on one side and they were resisted by armies of several German Protestant nobles, who relied mostly upon the financial aid of the English king James I, who supported the interests of his son-in-law, Frederick V, Elector Palatine, with substantial sums of money. These were: Ernst von Mansfeld, field marshal of the “Winter King”, Georg Friedrich, Margrave of Baden-Durlach and Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, who, with his army, stood on the right shore of Main under Frankfurt. Near the town of Höchst, the units of Duke of Brunswick built a bridge over Main, so that they could join the Mansfeld's army, which laid nearby on the other shore. However, when Tilly's army, which wanted to defend Frankfurt, appeared, the Duke of Brunswick and his army fought back. Tilly's forces had superior numbers and they had more artillery. The tactical situation of the Protestant army was bad – for case of retreat, there was nothing but one, quickly built bridge over Main. The battle was not a typical field battle; it was an unclear clash of forces near the town of Höchst and villages named Schäferberg and Sossenheim. Christian Brunswick was being constantly pushed to retreat by the bigger Catholic army and consistent artillery fire. However, the Protestant army lost the most men while retreating. Many men drowned in Main during the confused retreat. A confused crowd of retreating units, which did not manage to cross to the other shore in time, assembled at the bridge in Höchst. The formations of Christian Brunswick resisted heroically, but the result of combat could not be changed any more. Christian Brunswick had achieved his tactical plan to join his and Mansfeld troops, but it cost him 2 000 men. The Catholics probably lost only a little over 100 men.

85-True depiction of the town of Höchst and the surrounding landscape with battle between the imperial and Brunswick army, which took place in 1622.

True depiction of the town of Höchst and the surrounding landscape with battle between the imperial and Brunswick army, which took place in 1622.

Höchst, dne 20.06.1622

The town of Höchst is in front of us, on the right, there is a wide river, Main, over which the armies of Duke of Brunswick are fleeing; behind the town, the battle is in full progress yet. Fitting perspective and perfect engraving technique reminds of Václav Hollar. However, the engraving is not signed. Under the pictorial part of the print, there is an A–Z legend.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Wahre Vorbildung des Stettleins Höcchst und der beiliegenden Gelegenheit sampt der Schlacht so zwischen der Kays: und Braunsch: Armee geschehe 1622.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1584
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8473

The second part of the Thirty Years' War was the Palatine war. It followed after the defeat of the Bohemian Revolt on the White Mountain in 1620. Imperial, Bavarian and Spanish armies stood on one side and they were resisted by armies of several German Protestant nobles, who relied mostly upon the financial aid of the English king James I, who supported the interests of his son-in-law, Frederick V, Elector Palatine, with substantial sums of money. These were: Ernst von Mansfeld, field marshal of the “Winter King”, Georg Friedrich, Margrave of Baden-Durlach and Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, who, with his army, stood on the right shore of Main under Frankfurt. Near the town of Höchst, the units of Duke of Brunswick built a bridge over Main, so that they could join the Mansfeld's army, which laid nearby on the other shore. However, when Tilly's army, which wanted to defend Frankfurt, appeared, the Duke of Brunswick and his army fought back. Tilly's forces had superior numbers and they had more artillery. The tactical situation of the Protestant army was bad – for case of retreat, there was nothing but one, quickly built bridge over Main. The battle was not a typical field battle; it was an unclear clash of forces near the town of Höchst and villages named Schäferberg and Sossenheim. Christian Brunswick was being constantly pushed to retreat by the bigger Catholic army and consistent artillery fire. However, the Protestant army lost the most men while retreating. Many men drowned in Main during the confused retreat. A confused crowd of retreating units, which did not manage to cross to the other shore in time, assembled at the bridge in Höchst. The formations of Christian Brunswick resisted heroically, but the result of combat could not be changed any more. Christian Brunswick had achieved his tactical plan to join his and Mansfeld troops, but it cost him 2 000 men. The Catholics probably lost only a little over 100 men.

89-Drawing of city of Bergen op Zoom, which was besieged by Ambrogio Spinola, 1st Marquis of the Balbases and strongly defended by the townspeople. 1622.

Drawing of city of Bergen op Zoom, which was besieged by Ambrogio Spinola, 1st Marquis of the Balbases and strongly defended by the townspeople. 1622.

Bergen op Zoom, dne 18.07.1622 (do 27.08.1622)

The city of Bergen op Zoom is depicted from above, from the so-called bird's-eye view. In the surroundings, there are various Spanish battle structures, which served for approaching and storming the city. The town of Sternbergen is foreshadowed in the upper left part. Probably artificially created floods of the river Scheldt, which were supposed to be an impassable obstacle for any enemies, are extraordinary. Above the painting, there is the mentioned text.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Abrisz der Statt Bergen op Zoom, wie solche von Marquis Spinola belägert, hingegen von Stadtischen starck defendirt worden. 1622.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1584
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8473

Spain – as a Catholic great power under the reign of Spanish side of the House of Habsburg – was an ally of the Habsburg monarchy in the battle against Frederick V, Elector Palatine and his allies. Apart from the war in the empire, another war erupted in the Netherlands. Calvinist Netherlands supported anti-Catholic forces in the empire. The siege of Bergen op Zoom by armies of general Ambrogio Spinola, 1st Marquis of the Balbases from 18 July to 2 August 1622 was a part of this conflict between Spain and the Netherlands. However, the Battle of Fleurus on 29 August 1622 had put everything into motion. The Protestant army, lead by Mansfeld and Christian Brunswick, managed to fight through to the Netherlands, even though they suffered heavy losses, and they joined the Dutch army of Maurice, Prince of Orange. Spinola's siege of Bergen op Zoom was not safe any more, and thus he had to terminate the siege. Christian Brunswick lost an arm in this battle.

90-Drawing of the city of Bergen op Zoom with the Spanish camp from 1622.

Drawing of the city of Bergen op Zoom with the Spanish camp from 1622.

Bergen op Zoom, dne 18.07.1622 (do 27.08.1622)

The fortified city of Bergen op Zoom is in the centre of the painting. The land around the city shows chances of besieging Spaniards, camps, tents, positions of military units, marching regiment and several banners. The river Scheldt is swollen around the city. There is a Latin inscription above: „Delineatio urbis Bergenobsooma una cum hispanorum castris ad illam factis, anno 1622.“ German text is under the painting on the right. On the left, there is a writing on the water: „Verdroncken Landt – i.e. flooded ground“. To fortify the city, his surroundings were flooded.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Abrisz der Statt Bergen op Zoom sampt dem spänischen Läger im Jahr 1622.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1584
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8473

Spain – as a Catholic great power under the reign of Spanish side of the House of Habsburg – was an ally of the Habsburg monarchy in the battle against Frederick V, Elector Palatine and his allies. Apart from the war in the empire, another war erupted in the Netherlands. Calvinist Netherlands supported anti-Catholic forces in the empire. The siege of Bergen op Zoom by armies of general Ambrogio Spinola, 1st Marquis of the Balbases from 18 July to 2 August 1622 was a part of this conflict between Spain and the Netherlands. However, the Battle of Fleurus on 29 August 1622 had put everything into motion. The Protestant army, lead by Mansfeld and Christian Brunswick, managed to fight through to the Netherlands, even though they suffered heavy losses, and they joined the Dutch army of Maurice, Prince of Orange. Spinola's siege of Bergen op Zoom was not safe any more, and thus he had to terminate the siege. Christian Brunswick lost an arm in this battle.

86-True and real drawing of strong fortress Pfaffenmütz, which was besieged by Neuburg army on both sides of Rhein, as well as on the water, on 25 July 1622. Printed in 1622.

True and real drawing of strong fortress Pfaffenmütz, which was besieged by Neuburg army on both sides of Rhein, as well as on the water, on 25 July 1622. Printed in 1622.

Rheindorf, dne 25.07.1622

Wide Rhein river flows through the centre of the painting, we can see the heavily fortified island of Pfaffenmütz. Two ships sail on Rhein. Lower on the Rhein, there is a village of Rindorb (Rheindorf), Berchen is on the upper left. In the right upper corner of the painting, there is a legend with letters A–H. Above the painting, there is the mentioned text, below the painting, there is a four verse long German poem which describes the course of the siege.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Wahrer und eigentlicher Abrisz der starcken Vestung Pfaffenmütz, welche von ihrer Fürstl: Durchl: Newburgerischer Armata zu beyden Seiten des Reyhns, wie auch zu Wasser belägert wordem, im Jahr 1622 den 25. Julij. Gedruckt im Jahr 1622.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1584
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8476

In the second part of the Thirty Years' War, the battles moved from Bohemia to Palatinate. At that time, Dutchmen, who were Calvinists and supported Frederick V, Elector Palatinate, had taken the Rhineland island of Pfaffenmütz near Bonn. Soon after Battle of Höchst, where the army of Christian Brunswick–Wolfenbüttel was defeated by general Tilly on 10 June 1622, the island fortress of Pfaffenmütz was besieged by Neuburg and (according to this engraving) Spanish armies on 25 July 1622. Neuburg is a city on Danube, approximately 25 km to the west from Ingolstadt and the capital of so-called Neuburg Palatinate, whose rulers were relatives of Frederick V, Elector Palatine, but who stood on the side of Maxmilian I, Elector of Bavaria and his Catholic league. The Spanish forces were lead by general Hendrik van den Bergh.

87-Depiction of Dutch fort Pfaffenmütz between Cologne and Bonn on Rhein. 1622.

Depiction of Dutch fort Pfaffenmütz between Cologne and Bonn on Rhein. 1622.

Pfaffenmütz, dne 25.07.1622

The small painting portrays the fortified island of Pfaffenmütz in the middle of Rhein. In front of us, there is the village of Graen Rhindorf (correctly Gross-Rheindorf). Small stream Sieg joins Rhein. On the left side, in landscape covered in trees, there is a settlement called Berchen.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Gyger H. C., mědirytec

Originální název: Abbildung der holländischen Schantz Pfaffenmütz zwischen Köln und Bonn im Rhein erbowen. Anno 1622.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1584
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8476

In the second part of the Thirty Years' War, the battles moved from Bohemia to Palatinate. At that time, Dutchmen, who were Calvinists and supported Frederick V, Elector Palatinate, had taken the Rhineland island of Pfaffenmütz near Bonn. Soon after Battle of Höchst, where the army of Christian Brunswick–Wolfenbüttel was defeated by general Tilly on 10 June 1622, the island fortress of Pfaffenmütz was besieged by Neuburg and (according to this engraving) Spanish armies on 25 July 1622. Neuburg is a city on Danube, approximately 25 km to the west from Ingolstadt and the capital of so-called Neuburg Palatinate, whose rulers were relatives of Frederick V, Elector Palatine, but who stood on the side of Maxmilian I, Elector of Bavaria and his Catholic league. The Spanish forces were lead by general Hendrik van den Bergh.

91-Depiction of battle between Ernst von Mansfeld and Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel on one side and Don Corduba on the other side, between Flory and Gemblours in Belgium on 29 August 1622.

Depiction of battle between Ernst von Mansfeld and Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel on one side and Don Corduba on the other side, between Flory and Gemblours in Belgium on 29 August 1622.

mezi Fleurus a Gembloux, dne 29.08.1622

The mentioned Dutch text is at the upper side of the sheet. Portraits of Ernst von Mansfeld and Christian Brunswick are below. They both have large hats and marshal batons. The portraits have dimensions 6 x 9.5 cm and they were engraved by S. de Passe. The lower half of the sheet contains a painting of the actual battle. In the right front, there are riders with banners with dead horse nearby. The main scene of the painting is the cavalry attack lead by Duke of Brunswick, who decided the battle in his and Mansfeld's favour by this decisive attack of his. At the horizon, town of Flory is on the left and town of Gemblours is on the right. Under the painting, there is an extensive Dutch text concerning the course of the battle.

Signace: Rytina tištěna v tiskárně Jana Amelissza v Utrechtu.
Autor: Zeidlerus Andreas, poručík, kreslíř map a plánů

Originální název: Waerachtighe Af-Conterfeytinghe vanden grooten slach, gheschiet tusschen die van Manveld ende Brunns-wijcksche aen d´eene zijde ende Don Cordova aen d´ander zijde: Opden 29. August 1622 Tusschen Gembeloers ende Flory.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1596
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8476

Rhenish Palatinate, hereditary region of Frederick V, Elector Palatine, the symbol of resistance against the Catholic power of the emperor, was the main theatre of fights between 1620 and 1623. General Johann Tserclaes Tilly lead the imperial armies of the League. Protestant armies, which were mainly supported from England, because the English king James I was a father-in-law of Frederick, consisted mostly of the army of Ernst von Mansfeld and of units of Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, who entered the war side by side with the “Winter king”, because of knight's honour to his wife, queen Elisabeth, whom he loved. Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel was also being called “Halberstadt” after a cloister of the same name, whose foundation he administered. After various tactical movements and small, insignificant fights, prior to the joining of Mansfeld's and Brunswick's units, Christian Halberstadt suffered a crushing defeat near Höchst upon Main on 20 June 1622. This combat failure of Protestants changed the balance of power so significantly that Frederick V, Elector Palatine started to think about some settlement with the emperor and he had released Mansfeld and Christian Brunswick from his services because of this settlement. However, Christian Brunswick and Mansfeld had kept their forces, joined into one strong army and searched for more military adventures, which they soon found in connection with so-called general countries of the united Netherlands. They immediately withdrew to liberate Bergen op Zoom, which was under siege by Spaniards lead by Ambrogio Spinola, 1st Marquis of the Balbases. General Cordoba with his army intended to prevent the liberation, and the battle this print shows occurred. Spanish general was able to inflict great losses on the Protestant army, but he was not able to prevent them from entering the Netherlands. Spinola was then forced to withdraw from Bergen op Zoom. However, the Dutch soon felt unbearable economic stress which was caused by armies from Germany; Mansfeld and Brunswick were forced to part ways and search for new adventures, which they were able to find very soon in these turbulent times.

95-Actual depiction of severe fight which occurred between Mansfeld and Spanish (armies) on Brabant borders. 1622. Battle between Spanish and Mansfeld

Actual depiction of severe fight which occurred between Mansfeld and Spanish (armies) on Brabant borders. 1622. Battle between Spanish and Mansfeld's (armies) near Fleurus in Brabant duchy.

Fleurus, dne 29.08.1622

The engraving shows the battle of Fleury on 29 August 1622. In the front, we see Mansfeld's retreating army, in the middle, the fight is in full progress. On the left, there is a depiction of an attack of cavalry of Duke Christian of Brunswick, who, even though he was wounded on arm, had decided this battle in his favour, because it was a draw for a long time and Mansfeld's units were already partially retreating. In the end, Spaniards were defeated. The horizon of the landscape is a forest. In the front of us on the right, there are three fleeing musketeers of Mansfeld. Under the painting, there is an A–N legend.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Zeidlerus Andreas, poručík, kreslíř map a plánů

Originální název: Eigentliche Vorbildung des harten Treffens so zwischen Mansfeldischen und Spanischen auff den Brabändischen Grentzen vorgangen, Anno 1622. Praelium inter Hispanos et Mansfeldicos ad Floreacum in Brabantia.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1596
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8479

Rhenish Palatinate, hereditary region of Frederick V, Elector Palatine, the symbol of resistance against the Catholic power of the emperor, was the main theatre of fights between 1620 and 1623. General Johann Tserclaes Tilly lead the imperial armies of the League. Protestant armies, which were mainly supported from England, because the English king James I was a father-in-law of Frederick, consisted mostly of the army of Ernst von Mansfeld and of units of Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel, who entered the war side by side with the “Winter king”, because of knight's honour to his wife, queen Elisabeth, whom he loved. Christian, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel was also being called “Halberstadt” after a cloister of the same name, whose foundation he administered. After various tactical movements and small, insignificant fights, prior to the joining of Mansfeld's and Brunswick's units, Christian Halberstadt suffered a crushing defeat near Höchst upon Main on 20 June 1622. This combat failure of Protestants changed the balance of power so significantly that Frederick V, Elector Palatine started to think about some settlement with the emperor and he had released Mansfeld and Christian Brunswick from his services because of this settlement. However, Christian Brunswick and Mansfeld had kept their forces, joined into one strong army and searched for more military adventures, which they soon found in connection with so-called general countries of the united Netherlands. They immediately withdrew to liberate Bergen op Zoom, which was under siege by Spaniards lead by Ambrogio Spinola, 1st Marquis of the Balbases. General Cordoba with his army intended to prevent the liberation, and the battle this print shows occurred. Spanish general was able to inflict great losses on the Protestant army, but he was not able to prevent them from entering the Netherlands. Spinola was then forced to withdraw from Bergen op Zoom. However, the Dutch soon felt unbearable economic stress which was caused by armies from Germany; Mansfeld and Brunswick were forced to part ways and search for new adventures, which they were able to find very soon in these turbulent times.

97-The siege and conquest of the town and fortress of Mannheim in 1622.

The siege and conquest of the town and fortress of Mannheim in 1622.

Mannheim, dne 11.09.1622 (do 23.10.1622)

This is a schematic plan of the town of Mannheim with the river Rhine into which the Neckar flows. The landscape is studded with trees, which are all equally carved. The fortress of Mannheim is drawn without the construction details, just fortified facilities are carefully drawn up. Around the area, there are scattered individual soldiers and lines of shooting musketeers.

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Zeidlerus Andreas, poručík, kreslíř map a plánů

Originální název: Belägerung und Einnehmung der Statt und Vestung Mannheim. Anno 1622.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1596
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8479

After the defeat of the Protestant allies of Frederick V, Elector Palatinate in the Battle of Hochst (20 June, 1622), and Wimpfen (6 May 1622), Tilly continued in the conquest of the entire Lower Palatine, the inherited land of Frederick V, Elector Palatinate. He captured the capital city of Heidelberg on 6 September 1622. At the same time, the fortress of Mannheim was besieged and conquered; it finally surrendered to Tilly on 23 October 1622.

98-Sketch of the city and fortress of Mannheim, which was besieged and conquered by the imperial and the Bavarian (troops).

Sketch of the city and fortress of Mannheim, which was besieged and conquered by the imperial and the Bavarian (troops).

Mannheim, dne 11.09.1622 (do 23.10.1622)

In the middle of the image, there is a schematic drawing of the fortress of Mannheim with the rivers Rhine and Neckar. In the surroundings of the city, there are deployed cannons and many trees with spherical treetops. Explanatory notes A-T under the image are missing (cut off).

Signace: neuvedena
Autor: Zeidlerus Andreas, poručík, kreslíř map a plánů

Originální název: Abrisz der Statt und Vestuung Mannheim von Kayserisch, Bayrisch belägert und erobert.

Katalogová čísla:
Wilhelm Eduard Drugulin – Atlas historique Drugulin: 1596
Čeněk Zíbrt – Bibliografie české historie: 8479

After the defeat of the Protestant allies of Frederick V, Elector Palatinate in the Battle of Hochst (20 June, 1622), and Wimpfen (6 May 1622), Tilly continued in the conquest of the entire Lower Palatine, the inherited land of Frederick V, Elector Palatinate. He captured the capital city of Heidelberg on 6 September 1622. At the same time, the fortress of Mannheim was besieged and conquered; it finally surrendered to Tilly on 23 October 1622.

[Log In]   [webmaster]
web 30letavalka  |  Hrad Český Šternberg  ©2014-2025